INTRODUCTION
Magnetic Resonance (MR) is a versatile tool well suited for
non-invasive examination of neonates [1].
Though there is no risk associated with MR scans, its application
in newborns is limited due to the associated logistical challenges
of patient transport, comfort, life support, and physiological
monitoring.
A modular prototype incubator with air temperature and humidity
regulation and integrated high signal to noise ratio (S/N) radio
frequency (RF) coils was developed [2].
We assessed the performance of the incubator by studying 13
neonates already scheduled for MR examinations of the head or
body.
METHODS
and MATERIALS
Patients
All phantom and patient examinations were carried out on a GE
Signa CNV/I 1.5T MRI at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA),
Los Angeles, USA. Thirteen patients, 4 female, 9 male were studied.
The gestational age at birth ranged between 24 -41 weeks, age
at the time of examination was 4 weeks pre-term to 12 wks. Body
weight was between 1.2 – 4.6 kg and head circumferences
were 29.5 – 37 cm. Patients were recruited from the Neonatal
Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and the Pediatric Intensive Care
Unit (PICU). Patients were transported to the MRI suite and
setup for MRI using routine CHLA protocols but were placed in
the MR incubator. Patients were sedated as requested for the
clinical scan. Studies were approved by the CHLA Internal Review
Board (IRB). Informed consent was obtained from all parents
before the examinations.
MR Incubator
The incubator is shown in Fig. 1. It features
custom RF coils (head, body) sufficient to cover 95th percentile
of the newborn patient population specifically designed for
use in combination with the incubator. The double-walled patient
section has several hand ports for easy access from either side
of the MR table. For details of the incubator, please see reference
[2].

Figure
1a
|
|

Figure
1b
|
|
Figure
1. Modular MR Compatible Incubator on the GE 1.5T MR
patient table (a). A close up of the patient/head coil
set up showing the location of hand ports for easy patient
access, portals on the incubator for routing nasal cannula
tubes, ECG leads, pulse oximeter cable and fiber-optic
temperature probe (b).
|
Patient
Set-up
The incubator was placed on the MR table. Patient temperature
was measured at the axilla before and after the MRI study using
standard disposable temperature probes. Patients were placed
inside the incubator and connected to life sustaining equipment
such as oxygen lines, ventilator, and infusion pumps and with
vital signs monitoring equipment (pulse, heart rate, Spo2).
The air temperature of the incubator was set (28.5 - 36 °C)
as requested by NICU staff. Studies were run at moderate levels
of humidity (< 55% rH). A commercial fluoro-optic temperature
measuring equipment (Luxtron Corporation, Santa Clara, CA),
was used to monitor patient skin temperature during the MR examination.
The probe was placed on the head or abdomen depending on whether
a brain or abdominal examination was attempted. Accuracy of
the Luxtron equipment and the chemical thermometer was within
±0.1 °C. Patient vital signs, skin temperature (recorded
with Luxtron) and incubator settings (temperature, humidity)
were monitored and recorded during the course of the MR study.
Patient set up inside the pediatric body coil is shown in Figure
2. Please see the corresponding images for details of the
respective study and diagnosis. Our coils fitted over the patients
without obstructing the ventilator, nasal cannula and endo tracheal
tubes or monitoring leads (ECG, Spo2). All were routed through
the portals on the incubator (see Figure 1b) and connected to
the respective devices located inside the MRI room.

Figure
2
|
|
Figure
2. Body coil/patient set up for the incubator assembly
on the GE 1.5T MR patient table (a). Coronal images are
shown to illustrate pediatric body coil coverage (from
the pelvis to the knee), the axial SPGR T1 fatsat images
are shown pre and post (gadolinium 0.9cc) contrast to
show enhancement over the soft tissue mass consistent
with lymphangioma (b). From the rest of the images (not
shown), there was no evidence of bone or muscle involvement |
Phantom
Experiments
The performance of the incubator in respect to maintaining temperature,
oxygen level, and humidity was checked inside the MR before
any MR tests were conducted. Thereafter, several MR experiments
with model solution were carried-out to test the
a) MR performance of radiofrequency coils without incubator,
b) MR performance of radiofrequency coils with incubator –
but incubator functions switched off,
c) MR performance of radiofrequency coils with incubator –
with incubator on.
The
signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) was obtained from the images and
compared with S/N obtained from images acquired with the standard
GE head coil. With the head coil for newborns a S/N improvement
of a factor of ˜ 3 was achieved when compared with the
standard imaging coil. Before any patient studies were carried,
RF coils designated for the incubator were tuned and matched
on a few patients to study loading considerations and optimize
performance over the wide range of patient sizes. These adjustments
were done at the CHLA inside the NICU and were approved by the
CHLA IRB.
MR
Sequences
The standard adult head coil configuration file with additional
9 dB attenuation was used, since lower powers were required
for our experiments. This configuration file was used for the
pediatric head and body examinations to ensure the RF power
deposition stayed below FDA guidelines for the specific absorption
rate (SAR).
MR
imaging of the brain:
- axial T2w fast spin echo (FSE)
- sagital T1w, axial fluid attenuation inversed recovery (FLAIR)
- axial T1w, FLAIR
- axial, FLAIR
- single voxel PRESS MR spectroscopy
MR
imaging of pelvis and abdomen
- coronal T2w FSE
- axial and coronal fat sat T2w FSE
- coronal, axial and sagital T1w SE
- sagital T2w single shot FSE
- axial and coronal T1w fat sat spoiled gradient echo pre and
post contrast
MR
imaging of the heart
- axial and coronal gradient echo segmented k-space CINE
- axial and coronal T1w gated spin echo
- contrast –enhanced MR angiography
RESULTS
Patient
Studies
There where no adverse effects. MR images of excellent quality
were acquired in all studies. Brain MRI/MRS data from a 9-weeks-old
male patient with hydrocephalus are shown in Figure
3. Performance of the incubator remained was unchanged inside
the MR room. Skin temperature increase recorded with the Luxtron
equipment was under 0.5 °C for all patients except one where
it approached 1.0 °C.
Figure
3. MRI/MRS of a 9 week old male patient with hydrocephalus.
The sagittal T1 and axial FSE T2 images display uniform
coverage over the neonate brain. Axial FLAIR and diffusion
images show superior contrast-to-noise in addition to
the high image S/N. The proton spectrum as suspected had
low levels of NAA which could be related to the low brain
mass. |
Phantom
Studies
S/N of coils were within 1-2% with the incubator ON and OFF
which was under the manufacturer's daily tolerance for MRI system
operation. There were no detectable differences in the quality
of the images acquired with the incubator turned on or off,
respectively. This demonstrated the compatibility of the incubator
with MR.
DISCUSSIONS
and CONCLUSIONS
No
problems were encountered with placing the patients into the
incubator. The increase in skin temperature in one patient was
could be due to the prolonged MRI study (~65 minutes) and temperature
auto-regulation of the body rather than RF power deposition.
The temperature measured by the nurse before and after the scan
were within 0.5 °C for all but one subject where a drop
of 0.7 °C likely due to anesthesia slowing down metabolism
was observed. This drop could have been avoided by setting a
higher temperature for the incubator. The image resolution and
quality is far superior to images obtained with standard equipment.
With this study we demonstrated that MR studies can be successfully
carried out using a incubator system that provides controlled
temperature, oxygen, and humidity levels without compromising
the quality. This may in the future expand the patient population
for MR studies to those that are classified unstable for a MR
examination at present.
REFERENCES
[1]
Pediatric Neuroimaging, MRI Clinics of North America, February
2001 and references therein.
[2]
Srinivasan, R. et al. 10th ISMR, Book of Abstracts, p 799, 2002
[3] Dumoulin, C.L. et al. 10th ISMR, Book of Abstracts, p 2558,
2002